My Philosophy of Education Summary

In roughly of todays classrooms we the students be seated in rows of desks. We are forced to sit and listen to the teacher, be it in biology, math, English, and slang line after line of culture. We are receptacles to be filled by the teachers. We have attained companionship as an dictatorial if we complete the course with a %100. As society is seeing today, students existence given the stamp of approval arent really ready to autograph todays world. If youre going to school to be a biologist, it isnt just enough to know that water enters and exits the cell by dint of a care for recollected osmosis. You read to know why You need to be able to see all of this knowledge on a some(prenominal) broader scope than it has been presented to you. Students need to be taught to absorb this knowledge rather than to memorize it. The main problem of todays knowledgeal transcription is that it most of the multiplication does non teach how to think critically. I propose a system of e ducation in which teachers are not just depositing information in students, in which students are not just passive observers in an active world and in which knowledge is not just an absolute.The offset printing thing that needs to be done to achieve my system (philosophy) of education is to change the mood teachers are teaching all together. How many clock times do students talking amongst themselves outside the classroom about how good their teachers are. They go to class and interact with one teacher, and are taught everything from that one teachers perspective. In order to give the students a much broader perspective, two or maybe even three teachers, depending on the subject, should be placed in a class room. Each teacher would consequently present the information to the class. The students would then have a much broader spectrum of information to learn from. I am not implying that these teachers should tag-team forcing information down the students throat, but take differe nt approaches in helping them absorb the information done problem posing. The teachers are not placed in this system to survive high up on their pedestals throwing assignments at the students, but are to be working hand in hand with them. They would be learn from the students most as much as they would be teaching them.In an educational environment such as this one, the students should be able to stand in the teachers place and teach the teachers and their fellow students as well. The students are active participants here. They should be learning as much from their peers as their teachers, if not more than. This system could do a lot more work for the students, but not as much of the busy work we receive, and tire of, today. For example, students could be asked to do cogitateing writings, in which they would share what they have learned in the lessons. Student corpus discussions would also take up a large portion of the time in these classroom environments. What erupt test of ones knowledge than being put in a position where you are requisite to teach your fellow student? After each session both the student and the teach will go home feeling not stuffed with information, but a new view on some things that they would ponder as they head out into the rest of their daily routines.The basis of this system isnt what the teachers are teaching, or what the students are learning. It is how we perceive this thing we call knowledge. In this world knowledge isnt something tangible. It is not viewed as an absolute. cognition is an ongoing process that will never have a closing or an end. It is something that will continue to grow and change through the timeline of our people. cognition is not what the students are learning, or what the teachers are teaching. It is the process of self-discovery. A teacher could tell a student that when you mix chemic A and chemical B they make chemical C. That isnt the knowledge. The student can then actually mix chemical A an d chemical B and watch them make chemical C. That isnt knowledge. Knowledge is that individuals learning of how those to things interact and why when they mix they form chemical C. Knowledge is the process of education through self-discovery.This system I have shown you would change the way education is viewed in this world. If we had teachers that actually taught, and students that questioned the answers they were given, wed be much better off as a whole. If we keep going the way were going where are all the creative minds going to be approach path from in the next few years? If students continue saying that A + B = C, what are we going to do when the world poses us more complex problems that require ingenuity, creativity and drive to solve? We just need to understand that knowledge is not just some gold star, or trophy each of us can achieve, but a regularity of learning and understanding that our society needs t