Philosophy

In The Morality of Happiness , Annas explains that morality in antiquated times was not socially imposed hardly one by one derived as a consequence of face-to-face reflexion closely an unfilled purpose-driven life (Annas 27 She uses Aristotelian h wizardst to reversion up this examine . This will guide , not designate but explain Annas s representation of Aristotle s of honorable motive . Every view of Aristotle that is presented in the body of this essay is Annas s view of Aristotle Assuming that Annas is be in her explanation of Aristotle , the concluding paragraphs of this essay will short address some of the implications of Aristotle s ethicsAccording to Aristotle , honourable considerations be not for all(prenominal) ace moral philosophy begins as a quest for a better life . Those who atomic number 18 satisfied with their lives or lack the ability to contrive on their lives notifynot take away in the considerateness that is necessary for profit . spring chicken masses cannot plunge in ethics because they contrive lived enormous enough to be able to reflect on their accomplishments . too , slew who are so busy with their lives or do not apply the opportunity for leisure cannot work in ethics because they do not have the time that is inevitable for demonstration . Ethics is not for such people . For people to practice or control in ethical activeness , tierce things essential occur . First , people should be disgruntled with their lives . This whitethorn seem a rather singular way to sapidity at ethics , but those who are satisfied with their lives cannot subscribe to in ethics , at least not in the sense of ancient ethics secondly , dissatisfied people must require to improve their conditions disgruntled people can not be complacent most their situati ons if they are to engage in what passes for! ethical activities . Thirdly dissatisfied people should reflect on ways of living that may be considered improvement over their present conditions . Their reflections should be apt in to exchange for ethical .

Only individuals who fulfill these three criteria can engage in and benefit from the objective of ethical . Ethical would have no force for people who do not engage in such reflection on a personal level (Annas , p29The purpose of ethical reflection is not to apparently know what to do Ancient ethics is not to the highest tier knowing what to do . It is more about acting on knowing what to do . The tel eos (end ) or ending of ethical reflection is to act sensiblely upon what is known from the reflection . In Aristotelian ethics , it would not be ethical to act on feelings - desires or emotions - without reason . To do so would not be ethical More importantly , the sharp reflection must not be just for any(prenominal) objective it must be enjoin at achieving the teleos of one s lifeSo , in Aristotle s view , there is a way that one goes about implementing this knowledge obtained from self-directed rational reflection . The implementation must be based on deliberate choices or actions Deliberate acting is necessary because it is the only kind of human...If you want to get a full essay, rules of order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper